Protecting the EU economy against extraterritorial sanctions

Key messages

  • Business opposes the weaponisation of the sanctions policy and the use of such measures to pursue economic interests. Sanctions are designed specifically to enforce the respect of international law to counter fundamental threats to peace and stability and the protection of human rights and must be limited to these core purposes.
  • We welcome the political attention to this matter and support a more assertive approach by the EU to protect its sovereignty in economic diplomacy. Unilateral measures that risk escalation with third countries should remain an option of last resort and multilateral approaches should be actively sought where possible. Especially with the USA as our traditional ally, the main aim must remain to achieve alignment on sanctions policies and implementation. A close cooperation regarding sanctions should also be established with the UK as part of the future relation.
  • The aim must be to deter harmful action by third countries and, if necessary, to increase the costs for such harmful action. To do so, the toolbox needs to be better equipped with well-targeted, non-discriminatory, and well workable and implementable solutions. In the current absence of an effective mechanism, EU companies are caught between a rock and a hard place.
  • The EU, together with its allies, should take international leadership on this issue leveraging on its economic and political weight. The EU should insist on a multilateral strategy as this will increase the political strength of the argument.

Read our position paper: Recommendations to strengthen the EU foreign economic diplomacy in the area of sanctions

Investment Facilitation & Financing


Investment Facilitation & Financing

Transforming Greece into an attractive investment destination is key to increasing productivity, and SEV works systematically to develop and promote proposals in this direction. Priorities include the adoption of improved, user-friendly, and flexible investment incentives and tools, without excessive bureaucratic procedures and unnecessary regulatory burdens.

  • Functional and effective investment incentives: Improvement of existing investment incentives and adoption of new ones capable of serving the contemporary needs of businesses for their digital and green transformation, innovation, industrial modernisation and the broadening of Greek businesses’ participation in international value chains.
  • Removal of disincentives: Elimination of obstacles that hinder investment activity, with emphasis on administrative reform, the digitalisation and automation of procedures, legal certainty and the acceleration of the administration of justice.
  • Creating a competitive tax framework: Reduction or abolition of disproportionate tax burdens, contributions or levies.
  • Strengthening the capital market: Increasing the liquidity and depth of the capital market with a view to convergence with the objective of creating a Single European Capital Market, in order to support the investment needs of businesses.
  • Competitive financing: Access to financing on terms competitive at European level for the development of both medium-sized and larger businesses, as well as new, smaller and innovative ventures.
  • Facilitating growth: Incentives for mergers and acquisitions to support the scaling up of SMEs and the creation of larger, more competitive and more innovative mid-sized businesses.
  • Improvement of the procedures under the Development Law to establish it as the primary tool for financing productive investments.
  • Redefinition of the Strategic and Flagship Investments Regime, so that it applies exclusively to very large-scale investments with a catalytic impact on the productive upgrading, extroversion and structural development of the Greek economy.
  • Maximising the development outcomes of the European Recovery Fund and the available ESPA 2021–2027 resources, through targeted investments with a significant development footprint, with emphasis on the green and digital transition, the upgrading of infrastructure networks, the modernisation of the healthcare sector, the cultivation of new skills, the scaling up of SMEs and the promotion of strategic sectors of the Greek economy.
  • Removal of bureaucratic obstacles and simplification of licensing: establishment of a central licensing authority, single licences, binding adherence to timelines by public authorities, and acceleration of bureaucratic and judicial procedures.

Investments & Taxation Committee: The Committee contributes to shaping proposed tax interventions to create a competitive tax environment, such as developing attractive tax and investment incentives, eliminating bureaucracy, and simplifying investment licensing and tax procedures.

CONTACT PERSON

Athena Vounatsou
Director of Tax, Investments & Market Operation

Email me

CONTACT PERSON

John Hambas
Senior Advisor of Tax, Investments & Market Operation

Email me


Related

BusinessEurope Reform Barometer 2019 – Building an EU for European businesses to succeed globally

BusinessEurope’s EU Reform Barometer 2019 “Building an EU for European Businesses to succeed globally”, published on 20 March 2019, shows that the EU needs to do more to improve its competitiveness as EU growth has now been lower than US growth for 7 of the last 10 years. In addition, the Reform Barometer contains our annual survey of our member federations regarding progress on structural reform.

This year’s Reform Barometer looks in particular at how Europe is falling behind in its ability to develop world-leading firms.

We arrive at this conclusion for 3 reasons:

  • None of the top 10 global companies by market capitalisation are European.
  • Western Europe’s share of the top 10% of global firms in terms of profitability has dropped from 36% in the late 1990s to 24% now.
  • Finally, when considering large high-growth firms/’unicorns’ (start-ups that have reached 1 billion dollar market value within a short timeframe), the EU has not matched other regions when it comes to developing such firms, with the number and average value of unicorns in the EU significantly smaller than those in the USA and China.

Against this background it is concerning that, according to our survey of member federations, governments have failed to step up their reform efforts.  Our member federations consider that member states have satisfactorily implemented only 20% of the essential reforms agreed with the EU.

Detailed assessments by national member federations of progress on the country-specific recommendations (CSRs) issued by the European Commission for Greece can be downloaded below.